Abstract

Nine algorithms were implemented to overcome the problem associated with rendering highdynamic- range scientific imagery to low-dynamic-range display devices. The algorithms were evaluated using two paired-comparison psychophysical experiments judging preference and ”scientific usefulness”. The results showed that, on average, the Zone System algorithm performed best and the Local Color Correction method performed the worst. However, the performance of the algorithms depended on the type of data being visualized. The low correlation between the preference and scientific usefulness judgments (R2 = 0.31) indicated that observers used different criteria when judging the image preference versus scientific usefulness. The experiment was repeated using expert observers (radiologists) for an MR scan (Medical image). The results showed that the radiologists used similar criteria as the non-expert observers when judging the usefulness of the rendered images. A target detection experiment was conducted to measure the detectability of an embedded target in the Medical image. The result of the target detection experiment illustrated that the detectability of targets in the image is greatly influenced by the rendering algorithms due to the inherent difference in tone mapping among the algorithms.

Publication Date

2006

Comments

Submitted to ACM: Transactions on Applied Perception (2006). The authors are sincerely thankful to Garrett Johnson, Jiangtao (Willy) Kuang, and Hiro Yamaguchi for their help, valuable discussions, and comments throughout the research; and all the observers who participated in the psychophysical experiments for their time and support. Note: imported from RIT’s Digital Media Library running on DSpace to RIT Scholar Works in February 2014.

Document Type

Article

Department, Program, or Center

Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science (COS)

Campus

RIT – Main Campus

Share

COinS