Accounting income of Chinese companies reporting under both domestic ASBE accounting standards and International Accounting Standards ("IAS") is shown to lack timely incorporation of economic losses. This is less surprising for ASBE-compliant income, because although ASBE-standards are based on IAS< they lack important asymmetric rules, such as lower-of-cost-or-market, and impairment of long-term assets. More sinking is the absence of timely loss incorporation in financial statements certified by international auditors as IAS-compliant. IAS resemble common-law standards and are widely, believed to increase financial reporting quality. The timely incorporation of losses has become perhaps the single most important feature of income reporting under common law (Basa(1997). Ball, Kothari, and Robin (2000). We attribute the result to the comparatively low intent of managers and auditors to recognize economic losses in a timely (fashion, and conversely, to comparatively high political and tax influences on financial reporting practices. Our results imply that financial reporting cannot be improved simply by governments mandating accounting standards that evolved endogenously in different economies. The most fruitful area for Chinese accounting reform lies not in simply adopting or imitating international accounting standards, but in reforming domestic institutions such as the legal system, corporate governance and auditor training and independence.

Publication Date



Note: imported from RIT’s Digital Media Library running on DSpace to RIT Scholar Works in February 2014.

Document Type


Department, Program, or Center

Accounting (SCB)


RIT – Main Campus