This article may be accessed on the publisher's website (additional fees may apply) at: http://www.imaging.org/store/epub.cfm?abstrid=1226 It may also be accessed on the author's website (additional fees may apply) at: http://www.cis.rit.edu/people/faculty/montag/PDFs/paper43.pdf The performance in judging values in a univariate map encoded using five different color scales was tested in eleven subjects. Digital elevation maps (DEMs) were encoded using: 1) an RGB gray scale (RGB), 2) a gray scale based on CIELAB L* (L*), 3) a L* scale with an added red hue component (Red L*), 4) an L* scale with continuous hue change (Spectral L*), and 5) a gray scale based on luminance (Luminance). Performance was tested using an Evaluation task and a Production task. For both tasks judgments were made both with and without legends for all five encoding schemes. The results show a significant effect of choice of encoding scheme, the presence or absence of a legend, and an interaction between these two factors. Performance with a legend was significantly better than without one. The Spectral L* scale led to the best performance while Luminance encoding was the worst. This experiment is a first step in using quantifiable psychophysical procedures to evaluate the effectiveness of different color encoding schemes on the interpretability of multidimensional graphical images.
Department, Program, or Center
Chester F. Carlson Center for Imaging Science (COS)
Montag, Ethan, "The use of color in multidimensional graphical information display" (1999). IS&T/SID Seventh Color Imaging Conference: Color Science, Systems and Applications, 222-226. Accessed from
RIT – Main Campus